Thaks, Darek

I didn´t now that cache...
Amadeo.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Darek Czarkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Q: Why Tomcat return me a OLD version of my doc.jar in an Applet ?


did you clean up your local cache?
the jar file might be a local version of the file. You might not be able
to see the new version until you remove the old one. (usually
~/.java/.deployment/javaws/)

--
Darek Czarkowski

Infinite Source Systems Corp.
Ph: 604 294 6557 (Ext. 113)
Fx: 604 294 6507
www.infinitesource.ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



ce.ca
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 06:05, Amadeo Alonso wrote:
Hi list:

I apologize me last (&first) email to the list with faults on date and form
   Thanks to Mark Thomas for your explanations.

The problem I attempt to solve is the next:

When I demand the page 'http://expresiongrafica.caminos.upm.es/PAU/AppletDoc.html', which has an Applet with a tag 'archive=doc.jar', Tomcat (?) v5.5 returns me the OLD VERSION of 'doc.jar' (v1) with the old bugs, as I deduct from the 'Java Console'.

I have placed two <connector> tags in 'server.xml' file to use ports :80 y :8080 in the same way

but....

http://expresiongrafica.caminos.upm.es:8080/PAU/AppletDoc.html return de rigth 'doc.jar' (v2), OK:

http://expresiongrafica.caminos.upm.es:80/PAU/AppletDoc.html return de old 'doc.jar' (v1), BAD:

using  localhost/..., localhost:80/... y localhost:8080/...      OK (v2).


How can I destroy the old version? where is it? What is it happening? Is maybe a navigators problem?
 (I get  'similar' results with IE and Firefox )


Thanks in advance

Amadeo.
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to