Also, to follow up - there is another filter, this time from IBM devworks - could someone please try this and tell me I'm not going mad - there is a bug here? Code from http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-tomcat/index.html Ok - so set up the filter (DO NOT USE THE IE FILTER - this will bias your experiment) in web.xml change the settings to have a very much larger replace string than the search string - eg: <filter> <filter-name>Replace Text Filter</filter-name> <filter-class>com.ibm.devworks.filters.ReplaceTextFilter</filter-class> <init-param> <param-name>search</param-name> <param-value>cannot</param-value> </init-param> <init-param> <param-name>replace</param-name> <param-value>must not - ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever EVER</param-value> </init-param> </filter> so we are replacing a 6byte text string with a 2865byte text string. Run the filter - hopefully you will see some strange results as I have: here is the correct 3052byte output string **************************************************************************** ******************************************* <html> <head> </head> <body> <h1>A Sample Index File</h1> This is a sample index file. Please note that most pages on this site must not - ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever EVER be accessed through the Internet. </body> </html> **************************************************************************** ******************************************* and here is what we recieve in IE 5.5 (193 bytes exactly) **************************************************************************** ******************************************* <html> <head> </head> <body> <h1>A Sample Index File</h1> This is a sample index file. Please note that most pages on this site must not - ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever eve **************************************************************************** ******************************************* and now, strangest of all (why do different browsers get different data from same filter - wierd indeed) the netscape 4.75 response (1460bytes) **************************************************************************** ******************************************* <html> <head> </head> <body> <h1>A Sample Index File</h1> This is a sample index file. Please note that most pages on this site must not - ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever **************************************************************************** ******************************************* So there you have it - I hope these findings are repeatable - and someone can explain why this happens - for now, I'm puzzled. Cheers, Tom -----Original Message----- From: HEBBRON,TOM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 August 2001 10:56 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Strange bug - XSLT filter on Tomcat 4.0 b6 Hi - I've been writing an XSLT filter using the servlet 2.3 filter mechanism, and have come across this bug several times, including in the example xslt filter at suns JDC (http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2001/tt0626.html#tip2) Basically, if the size of the transformation result is greater than the source xml file size, the output will be truncated. So, if I serve index.xml (599bytes) using the filter, and an xsl file which adds quite a lot of fancy html around the data from index.xml, I wil only get the first 599bytes of the output - although printing this output to System.out just after calling transformer.transform will yield the complete result stream. The code I am using is published at the above URL. I have also tried a couple of other example XSLT filters, and all of them have either come up with this error, or failed to work completely. Is this a problem with adding to the size of the servlet response - is it a fixed size? Thanks for any help/suggestions - I felt sure that someone else must have discovered this as well, but couldn't see anything on the web or mail archives. -- Tom Hebbron Tel: + 44 (0) 11731 29300 hp BCO e-business Fax: + 44 (0) 11731 29923 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange bug - XSLT filter on Tomcat 4.0 b6
HEBBRON,TOM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2) Wed, 01 Aug 2001 03:37:25 -0700
- Strange bug - XSLT filter on Tomcat 4.0... HEBBRON,TOM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)
- Re: Strange bug - XSLT filter on T... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Strange bug - XSLT filter ... Stuart Halloway
- RE: Strange bug - XSLT filter on T... HEBBRON,TOM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex2)
- RE: Strange bug - XSLT filter ... Craig R. McClanahan