Here is a precompiled binary and also tips on building.  
http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/ 





"Ola Theander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/22/2002 02:16 nite
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"

 
        To:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Problm. building tomcat 4.0.4 jk connector for use with Apache 
2.0.39. JDK 
1.4.x?

Dear subscribers.

I have a problem building the 4.0.4 JK connector so I can integrate my
Tomcat installation with Apache 2. I've tested the webapp connector with
Apache 2.0.36 but since I upgraded to 2.0.39 I get the now infamous
message "mod_dev.c not compatible with...". Therefore I like to switch
to the JK connector and I also hope that the JK connector will work with
Apache 2.0.39. There are also other reasons why I will change to the jk
connector. I've learned to understand that it's much more mature and the
webapp connector doesn't have any real advantages.

The problem is that the build process chokes since it not able to find
the javax.servlets.* packages. I don't know if this is because I use JDK
1.4.0 or some kind of configuration error. I've started with changing
the build.properties file in the jk library. But after trying to build
with Ant I figured that some helper files was needed before the build
could succeed. It complained about not finding some tomcat-coyote.jar
file to copy, so I started the build from the connector's source root
folder and then it stopped when it failed to find the javax.servlets.*
packages mentioned above. Am I totally on the wrong track here? There
where also a few messages after the "Package javax.servlets does not
exist" complaining about deprecated methods in the javax.servlets
package but that might perhaps be an inherited problem?

Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards, Ola Theander



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to