i must have broke something in my 4.1.10 build, because I was able to 
use symlinks without a problem

Turner, John wrote:

>Not sure, I haven't jumped to 4.1.10+ yet except for miscellaneous testing.
>
>
>The symlink issue was discussed in a fair amount of detail within the last
>week on this list, as it apparently caught some people by surprise (those
>who needed symlinks ended up with broken apps when moving to 4.1.10).
>Apparently 4.1.11 (and I assume 4.1.12) have the ability to turn this on and
>off, while 4.1.10 just has them off, period.
>
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=103239739330385&w=2
>
>John
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Denny Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:40 PM
>>To: Tomcat Users List
>>Subject: Re: Symlinks
>>
>>
>>Where is this turned off at? The server I tested against was 
>>4.1.10, but 
>>I did change the server.xml file, so if it is in there I 
>>guess I could 
>>have messed it up. Also, I did not start the server with a -security 
>>option, does that matter?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Denny
>>
>>Turner, John wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Symlinks are off by default in 4.1.10 and higher.  Check the 
>>>      
>>>
>>online release
>>    
>>
>>>notes for more information.
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Denny Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:30 PM
>>>>To: Tomcat Users List
>>>>Subject: Symlinks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>   Is there any way to tell Tomcat to not follow symlinks? 
>>>>If not how 
>>>>can I protect my server against malicious symlinks? Is the 
>>>>java.io.FilePermissions smart enough to figure these out?
>>>>
>>>>For example if I give read access only to directory "foo" 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>through the 
>>    
>>
>>>>java.io.FilePermissions, but inside of "foo", there is a 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>symlink that 
>>    
>>
>>>>points to a file "bar", which really exists outside of the 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>directory 
>>    
>>
>>>>"foo". Is the Security Manager smart enough to catch this.
>>>>
>>>>I have also found that while I can't see a WEB-INF 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>directory from the 
>>    
>>
>>>>browser using a URL like so:
>>>>
>>>>   http://myserver:8080/myapp/WEB-INF/,
>>>>
>>>>I can create a symlink in $CATALINA_HOME/webapp/myapp/ which 
>>>>points to a 
>>>>WEB-INF directory, then I can see that directory as plane 
>>>>        
>>>>
>>as day. How 
>>    
>>
>>>>can you protect your server from these sort of things.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Denny
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: 
>>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>--
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
>>>      
>>>
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  
>
>>For additional commands, e-mail:
>>    
>>
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  
>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to