Did I miss something that I should I have changed  in some other files or place?
All I did  was to change the ports number in server.xml

On 20 Nov 2002 at 7:33, Pae Choi wrote:

> Strange! I've been testing HTTP with port 80, 8080, and even other
> ports for tunneling and HTTPS with port 443, 8443, and ohters for
> tunneling. They all work fine with IE v6.0 since TC v4.1.12 came
> out.
> 
> 
> Pae
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 3:33 AM
> Subject: RE: HTTP and SSL Connector port problems
> 
> 
> > Another good reason to change to 80/443 is the following issue:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg73342.html
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13861
> >
> > If you use a security-constraint confidential to force ssl you might
> > have a problem with IE when using 8080/8443.
> > Actually "confidential" should force the browser to reload a resource if
> > you accessed it with http instead https. For Mozilla/Opera this works
> > fine for me, with Internet Explorer the reload stalls and the browser
> > stops loading. According to other posting you can fix it when using
> > 80/443.
> >
> > I guess this is due to a url rewriting problem with IE. Maybe IE just
> > changes the protocol from http to https instead of taking the port
> > numbers into account aswell which can't work with non-standard ports...?
> > The problem with IE only occurs when using non-standard ports such as
> > 8080/8443 for http/https. If you use 80/443 you can avoid this IE bug in
> > connection with the confidential settings. Then you don't need to
> > hardcode absolute links.
> >
> > Don't know if you need that, but keep it in mind, if you use security
> > constraints.
> > The same problem occurs when using Apache in front of Tomcat. Tested
> > both. IE will behave the same, so run Apache or Tomcat on 80/443 and
> > don't forget to the the redirect ports in either the http1/1 connector
> > and/or the Ajp-Connector.
> >
> > Mech
> >
> > P.S. Don't use Tomat 4.1.12 with SSL, upgrade to 4.1.14. Minor? ssl
> > warning bug:
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14164
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 12:04
> > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > Subject: HTTP and SSL Connector port problems
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there any particular good reason to change HTTP port from
> > > 8080 to 80 and the SSL connector port from 8443 to 443?
> > > They causing problems for me. Some people are suggesting that
> > > we should
> > > change the ports.
> > >
> > > I changed the HTTP Connector port from 8080 to 80
> > > Then I uncommented the SSL Connector section and changed the
> > > SSL port from 8443 to 443
> > > These are supposed to be well-known ports. But how come after I
> > > made the changes, Tomcat just refused to
> > > start? I am on the Win2000 platform.
> > >
> > > <!-- Define a non-SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8080
> > > --> <Connector
> > > className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
> > >        port="80" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> > >        enableLookups="true" redirectPort="443"
> > >        acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000"
> > >        useURIValidationHack="false" />
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > <!-- Define a SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 -->
> > > <Connector
> > > className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
> > >        port="443" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
> > >        enableLookups="true"
> > >        acceptCount="10" debug="0" scheme="https" secure="true"
> > >        useURIValidationHack="false">
> > > <Factory className=
> > >        "org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteServerSocketFactory"
> > >        clientAuth="false" protocol="TLS"/>
> > > </Connector>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to