> The document that you are referring to, I think, is incomplete or wrong. > When I tried it I found that some sections were in correct or > misleading, or just didn't work. So I found it best to just ignore that > document.
Sorry to hear that. I haven't gotten around to testing it, yet. However, the document seamed more complete than anything I've seen so far. I'll stick to it until I hit a road-stop. > As a side note, is there any reason why version 2.0.2 of JK2 doesn't > include a Linux binary? I've built one myself but shouldn't there be a > binary? Are there some settings that are hard coded when the library > gets compiled? I'm on Tru64 UNIX and am doomed (or blessed?) to compile and configure everything myself. Nix. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
