Hi Karsten. > - Bridge network statuses contain a "published" line
Oh, I didn't realize that there was a consensus that included bridges. Mind explaining where they come from and what they're for? Which category can I find these in on the metrics data page? I haven't implemented network status entries yet so changes there aren't a concern, though it would be useful for me to have one as an example. > Server descriptors and extra-info descriptors are stored under the SHA1 > hashes of the descriptor identifiers of their non-scrubbed forms. Stem provides its caller with the descriptor's path but doesn't try to do anything with it, so this isn't a concern. > Server descriptors and extra-info descriptors contain a new "router-digest" > line with the hex-formatted descriptor identifier. Not following. Is this new 'router-digest' entry only in the bridge descriptors? Is it a bridge equivalent for a relay server descriptor's 'fingerprint' field? Again, an example of the new descriptors would be nice to have. > Bridge nicknames (#5684) in all descriptor types Minor tweak for the is_scrubbed() method, but that's all. > ... and dirreq-* statistics lines (#5807) in extra-info descriptors are not > sanitized anymore. I didn't realize that bridge extrainfo descriptors _were_ sanitized. What section of the format page details the scrubbing for those? I've never tried running the stem parser over a bridge extrainfo descriptor, so again an example would be useful. :) Cheers! -Damian _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
