On 04/21/2013 04:40:16 PM, Felix Janda wrote:
> If you can come up with a clean way to share the code, go for it.
Ok, actually I'd only put something like get_access_str() of stat into
the lib.
Cool. Although a quick glance at the one in stat implies it doesn't
handle the fun combinations of "suid and sgid bits without
corresponding executable bit when applied to a directory so it's the
sticky bit" that I had to make work in ls.
stat /dev/null
stat /tmp
So if you actually need that behavior you'll need the blob of ls
starting around line 340...
> I'm leaning against it. If you saw my toybox talk at ELC (it's on
> youtube) I talked about security approaches and containers vs
selinux.
I anticipated that (and read your outline and skimmed the video). So
it
would be ok to remove the SELinux parts from the command (which anyway
only say that they are not implemented)?
Yes.
Should "%T" be implemented?
I'd wait for somebody to complain about its absence.
Rob
_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
Toybox@lists.landley.net
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
