Could it be that these verses have more than one thing that we can learn from them?  I see two things here (The accusers were hypocrites, and we all sin without always really seeing sin in our words and actions) .  I would not be surprised to see more with careful study.  That is one of the great things about reading and re-reading the Word.



Taylor wrote:
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross

Have you read the law Bill?  Yes
Why didn't these do gooders bring them both to Jesus since they were both involved in the same
act and they were caught at the same time?   I don't know, Judy; I could speculate if you like. The point of the story is to illustrate their blatant hypocrisy rather than their own personal list of failures.
 
By the way, Judy, have you noticed that you are sending two of each message to TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org and then two more copies of the same via Cc? This may be why John is seeing doubles.
 
Bill
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:00:15 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
. . . but noone said a word about the man and the Law said they were both to be stoned.
 
It is not I who speculates, Judy.
 
Bill
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No that's not it  at all Bill
Would you like to add your speculation about the man now to the clear Words of scripture?
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:44:15 -0700 "Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
. . . but noone said a word about the man and the Law said they were both to be stoned.
 
So Jesus let her off on a legal technicality. Is that it?
 
What makes you so sure they had not already stoned the man?   Bill
From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Who is trying to kill you, Blaine, or anyone else JD. Don't make this into something it's not.  The men Jesus was
speaking to were going to stone the adultress to death but noone said a word about the man and the Law said they
were both to be stoned.  As for TT.  Mormon handshakes and sacred signs are occult and Mormonism itself is
considered to be a cult by Mainstream Christianity.  So what is your problem?  Does speaking the truth to you
make the messenger your enemy?
 
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:00:22 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't take it as a personal insult.  I knew you didn't have that thought.  No apology needed, but yours is appreciated, nonetheless.  Fair is fair,  Blaine, but I think we both know the rest of the story.   You are right -- on TT it is apparently OK to do or say whatever as long as one thinks the opponent is  the enemy.  
 
When Christ said  "He who is without sin cast the .....,"  it is clear the He believed  that all possess sin at any given moment  on some level  ...........but the sinless      
   perfection crowd arrogantly disagrees  (when it is so obvious otherwise.)
 
jd
 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Hmmm, JD is right, denigrating the symbols of another's religious beliefs was wrong.  I apologize--apparently I offended JD, although I did so unthinkingly and without intention.  It just came off the top of my head.  Sometimes we get too caught up in proving our opinions and beliefs are more valid than every one else's, and I think I may have done just that. 
Now, if I may, I would like to ask for an apology from anyone who supported waving Mormon underclothing in public by the street preachers at general conference in Salt Lake City.    And, the same for those who more recently have denigrated Mormon handshakes, and other sacred symbols on TT.  And the same for those who have insisted on spelling "Mormon" with a lower-case letter. :>)
 What is fair is fair, huh? 
Blainerb
 
In a message dated 12/13/2005 8:37:10 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes  !   and , by the way,   DH, your assessment of the world's point of view on this is neither accurate or relevant.  
 
and this statement borders on insulting:    
One of the weirdest songs I ever heard was The Old Rugged Cross.  It seemed  to glorify the cross in a negative way.  I doubt the Lord even to this day is overly fond of that old rugged cross. :>)
Blainerb 
 
 
I have to say something here  --  both of you have made it clear  (and I am not angry , by the way)  that your stay here on TT has given you nothing in terms of reason for crossing over.   Well,   consider your failure in this regard, as well.   With as much  variety as exists here amongst us Christians,  you would think someone would consider the Mormon religion.  But this latest discussion, while revealing, would surely close the door to any serious student of the Bible.   To put down "death" and the "cross"  is to simply miss the point of the life of Christ here on this earth  ..............  and miss the mark by a wide margin  !!!  
 
jd
 
 
 

                                         judyt                                       
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
                              is a liar (1 John 2:4)
 

                                         judyt                                       
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
                              is a liar (1 John 2:4)
 

                                         judyt                                       
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
                              is a liar (1 John 2:4)

Reply via email to