----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 23, 2006 17:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Williams
on Creationism
Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North?
"if ever a continent
of covenant-breakers deserved this attribution
(extermination), the "native Americans" did." Pope Gary North
(comments added)
Pope Gary North "The long-term goal of Christians in politics should
be to gain exclusive control over the franchise. Those who refuse
to submit...must be denied citizenship".
Reformed Baptist? LOL
Baptist Reconstruction? LOL
Baptist Kingdom builders? LOL
Baptist DominionISM? LOL
Baptist Pope ROTFL
RC Pope Calvin
Reformed Presbyterian
Bring in the kingdom Presbytery & JD
Replacement Theology "We are Jews" Presbytery,
Romans, Reformed C's, Mormons, Reformed, JD & Lance!
Apparently you are TOTALLY IGNORANT of Baptists
see # 4 The priesthood of the believer & #5 right of soul liberty
or religious liberty
# 7 The Separation of Church and State
Try to get your baseless assertions straight:
Gary North Reformed Catholic - Presbytery
RJ Rushdoony Reformed Catholic - Presbytery
Gary Demar -Reformed Catholic - presbytery
Kindy garten 101 - Who is who?
PROTESTant RC Zwingly - Holding Bible & SWORD
For all you kiddies TEST QUESTION who has the
sword?
Even some Presbyterian RC's admit they are just RC
Dominion is the Sole Realm of Popes, Protestants
& Potentates!!!
Again all the ammo you have is Psycho assertionISM!
Name smearing and grossly misrepresenting peoples beliefs.
These REFORMED Catholics are just like their Papa
Baptists do not preach this baloney never have.
Popes Protestants and Potentates have blood on their hands.
Most times it was the blood of Baptists
You defame their pure blood, shed by murderous RC's
Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was
slain among you
RJ Rushdooney
The Royal Race of the
Redeemed?
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is KD a pseudonym for Gary North? Have you
finally come out of hiding after the Y2K fiasco? I do believe that were
we to remove the hoods from some on TT we would see that which underlies
the hatred that you spread throughout the mid-east and,
elsewhere.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 23, 2006 07:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
AGAIN you show your Short Comprehension
I am NOT a REFORMED CATHOLIC.
wrong slot Lance, better take it to your friends for a
consensus
What do you know of RJR?
Not as much as you think, I suppose.
He is NOT a Fundamentalist
Like Papa like son, bring out the stake....
Spoken like a true studen of
RJR.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: March 22, 2006
21:05
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Williams on Creationism
Let's have them Teach Dominion Theology in school ;
)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm talking about fundy creationist versions in the school
systems and you are talking about religious
people!!! Amazing
Maybe we should install a different creationist version for
every major school system
.................... I am sure we can find enough
fundy ideas to go around. That way , you would have to
worry about consensus and no one will have the slightest
idea what to believe. but you and Kev will be happy.
CONSENSUS BE DAMNED. KNOW THE TRUTH AND IT SHALL
MAKE YOU FREE !!
jd
--------------
Original message --------------
From: Judy Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I surmised as much JD; my point being
that religious ppl have many
and varied points of view about
anything and everything and this is no
measure by which to gauge what is
needful or true.
Do you even know what this thread is about,
Judy?
WHICH VIEW OF CREATIONISM GETS INTO THE
CIRRICULUM -- HUH ???
From:
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So?
There isn't a single view of the
whole church that is agreed upon
by the whole church either.
What does that prove? judyt
Perhaps the Bishop has the same concerns I
do. I know this --
there isn't a single view of creationism that is
agreed upon by the whole church.
jd
--------------
Original message --------------
From: "David
Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John wrote:
> The world in which we live would reject
> any mention of God in the evolutionary
process,
> IMO. But creationism in
the schools? Could
> that not be considered the beginnings of a
fanatical
> fundamentalist take-over of the culture?
ROTFLOL. I sure hope you were being
facetious on purpose.
John wrote:
> But to allow a mere statement that
suggests God
> is somehow in control as the
Creator(?) If this
> could be presented into the secular system
of
> education without it being coopted by the
fundies
> -- go for it. But I doubt
that it can. What a shame
> that radical fundamentalism within
Christiandom forces
> the Body to dismiss a perfectly wonderful
opportunity
> to introduce the Creator to others.
In case you did not notice, the
fundamentalists are not causing the
acknowledgement of our Creator to be forbidden
in schools. It is the liberal loonies like
this Archbishop of Canterbury who are doing
this.
David Miller
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make
PC-to-Phone
Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with
Voice.