No, no one has ever asked if JCS is slow. Something is definitely wrong. The cache is not significantly slower than a hashtable. Can you give more details about your configuration (i.e. the cache.ccf file) and what you are caching.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Spaggiari, Jean-Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:18 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Is JCS slow ? > > Hi all. > > Sorry if it's a question that you have always see, but i'm not able to > look > at the archives ... > > I'm using JCS in an application where i need to look 1600 time on the > cache > in a loop. > > The cache is empty at this time. > > For loop take about 160 seconds. > > Using hashtable instead of JCS take about 1s ... > > Where is my mistake ? Because I think I have do a mistake. It's not > posible > that JCS was 160 time slower than a Hashable ... > > An running JCS in a servlet on JBoss. Is it posible it come from here ? > > Thanks for your help. > > JMS. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
