Me too (aka +1)

On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 09:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Richard, fwiw, I love the idea of a single checkstyle properties file.
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
> Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
> 
> 
>                                                                                      
>                                    
>                     Richard Emberson                                                 
>                                    
>                     <remberson@outerharb       To:     
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]                              
>                     or.com>                    cc:                                   
>                                    
>                     Sent by:                   Subject:     Re: code conventions, 
>maven's default checkstyle settings    
>                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
>                                    
>                     ocaldomain                                                       
>                                    
>                                                                                      
>                                    
>                                                                                      
>                                    
>                     05/29/02 11:39 PM                                                
>                                    
>                     Please respond to                                                
>                                    
>                     "Turbine Maven                                                   
>                                    
>                     Developers List"                                                 
>                                    
>                                                                                      
>                                    
>                                                                                      
>                                    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you get some third party source that you wish to maintain as a part
> of a larger project, odds
> are its coding conventions do not match the rest of the project's. I
> generally adhere to the
> policy that one codes in the format of the surrounding code - in the
> third party's code I
> would follow their coding conventions even if they are not my own. If
> this is not done
> then one gets really hard to read third party code. I believe many large
> 
> development
> organizations have a similar policy. What this means is that being able
> to easily set
> style policy on a project by project bases is very useful.
> 
> Forcing one to copy and paste all of the style properties each time a
> new project is create
> can not be a good thing ... what if your group decides to change one
> little style property; you
> have to edit all property files. This runs against a tenant of software
> engineering - one
> should code it only once and then import by reference not copy and paste
> 
> over and over again.
> 
> I have always felt that the Sun style should be the default style for
> all Java
> code (even though when I started coding Java it was not my C++ style ...
> I
> just changed to the style of the language developer) - but I understand
> that
> others have their reasons for having their own way of doing things. I
> once
> worked with a real smart Java programmer (now studying to be a Buddist
> monk in Thailand) who coded Java in the gnu-C style (as a result of that
> 
> I wrote a Java formatter that can convert between styles - if you have
> used
> Jindent then as a comparison Jindent is a childs toy (IMFO)). .....
> 
> Anyway, as I suggested in my Tuesday email "maven's default checkstyle
> settings"
> maven should allow one to refer to a separate property file for any
> given project's
> style. That way one gets a centralized set of style property files for
> an organization.
> 
> 
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to