Since this is about jars, you could easily put that kind of detail (to be able to track down cvs checkout time), by adding it to the MANIFEST.MF.
I think your suggested format (at least for me) is already pretty "heavy" , so HHMMSS added would really get me confused ;) Mvgr, Martin On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 19:08, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 13:03, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > > > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 11:58, James Taylor wrote: > > >> On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 11:28, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I am currently cleaning up all the JAR names in the repository: giving > > >>> them versioned names and giving the -dev JARs the versioning we agreed > > >>> upon: id-yy-mm-dd-build#.jar. This makes things sortable. > > >> > > >> -1 on this naming convention. Rather than build number I would prefer to > > >> see a higher precision timestamp (something to the second) of when the > > >> checkout was done, so that one could recreate the jar from CVS. > > > > You don't give a reason for your -1 > > I believe the reasoning is that we want to give someone an identifier > that they can use to grab hold of the original sources if they wish. The > date + build# still doesn't accurately describe how to get the sources > in question. > > > -jon > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
