Matthew Bevan, el s�bado 7 de enero a las 16:53 me escribiste:
> Also changed was the default encryption behavior, which includes a
> rot13 tester, and encryption aliases ("sha1" vs. "sha", etc.).
I don't think adding aliases is a good thing (in this case). Is too simple
to make it complex, what if tomorrow is there a sha2 algorithm and someone
use just "sha"? It could be confusing and is harder to maintain and document
and there is no real gain in adding aliases IMHO...
--
Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/
.------------------------------------------------------------------------,
\ GPG: 5F5A8D05 // F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05 /
'--------------------------------------------------------------------'
Si por el chancho fuera, se autocomería con chimichurri Worshestershire!
