Thanks for that Bryan, I'll take a look. Re. C++, Sebastien has opened a JIRA for that ... http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-840.
BTW, it's my fault for not noticing, but you will have already seen this note once, sent directly to you. That's beacuse you sent your original note both to me and to the mailing list. My gmail client only sent my response to you, but cleverly shows it in my "tuscany-dev" thread view, so as far as I could tell I had sent a response to the mailing list. I wonder how often this has happened before! I guess the safest thing to avoid this situation is to post just to the mailing list. Best Regards, Kelvin. On 18/10/06, Bryan Luoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I am a member of the QA team at Rogue Wave Software. I work closely with the HydraSDO Development Team on the HydraSDO for XML product (C++ and Java). I recently attached a couple of sample Java tests that we currently have in our junit test-suite which exercise HydraSDO for XML. The zip archive (sdo.zip) has been attached to the following JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829 The archive consists of two junit tests (XMLDataObjectTest.java and DataObjectList.java) and a helper class (TestHelper.java). XMLDataObjectTest.java has 120 test-cases that test the DataObject interface. This test uses several underlying RW implementation specific classes to perform some of the work. This is not a generic SDO API test that is ready to integrate into Tuscany. DataObjectListTest.java has 23 test-cases that test "list" functionality of DataObject. This test does not use RW implementation specific classes and should be easier to integrate into Tuscany as is. TestHelper.java is used by XMLDataObjectTest.java to help create DataGraphs and load input files. The TestHelper also uses RW implementation specific classes. We are excited and willing to contribute SDO unit-tests to the Tuscany project. The purpose of this initial "drop" is to help identify what steps need to be taken in order to simplify/maximize our contributions and to benefit from additional SDO API tests authored by the Tuscany project community. Sometime in the near future, RW will attempt to separate the RW implementation specific tests from the generic SDO API tests as much as possible. There has also been discussion of implementing an abstraction layer that would allow Tuscany and RW to exchange tests to exercise the respective products. We also have C++ unit tests (cxxTest Framework) that we use to exercise HydraSDO. Sounds like this would be a separate JIRA all together? Thanks, Bryan Luoma -----Original Message----- From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:46 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples Tom, Welcome to Tuscany! that's great! Thanks for offering to get involved. How should we proceed? I'd be most happy to assist you to integrate what you have to offer. We currently have a small collection of tests using the junit framework (see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/impl/src/tes t/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/) but there's significant scope for enhancement. BTW I'm going to make my response Java centric as Andrew has offered to help look at the C++ side of things. How about this for a proposal for how to proceed? I have opened a JIRA (this is our issue or bug tracking system if you are not familiar with these things --- please tell me if you are already an expert). The JIRA can be seen at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829 , and you can upload attachments to the JIRA, so we could perhaps use that to first attach a typical RogueWave test or two. I guess it's likely that there will be some modifications that need to be made with regards to setting up the test within our environment, but that way we could play and discuss how we might proceed with more tests. How does that sound? Best Regards, Kelvin. On 11/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > Coming from the C++ side of Tuscany, I know we'd certainly be > interested in those C++ SDO tests - please get involved! > > Cheers > Andrew > > On 10/11/06, T Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kelvin - > > > > We at Rogue Wave have been developing an SDO product, HydraSDO, and have > a > > seires of tests that might be easiliy modified so as to exercise your > Java > > SDO product. We would be very interested in providing our tests as well > as > > helping create a test environment (unless this has already been done) to > > futher test the SDO product. Additionally, we also have C++ tests. > > > > > > tom gould > > ------------------------------- > > > > As the Java M2 release is imminent it occured to me that it would be > really > > useful if there are users out there who are putting our code through its > > paces that you may be developing samples/tests which could usefully be > > contributed back to the Tuscany project and make it more robust. If you > are > > in such a position it would be really great to hear from you. > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
