On 12/15/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI, I am making some attempts to understand the DataBinding fwk and so shall say something here so that others will help me understand better. My apologies if I have mentioned something outrageous as I am just about entering into this discussion :) - By employing the databinding interceptors we expect that when the data comes into the JMS Target Invoker as payload, it is already transformed and ready to be dispatched. Is that so? - Why not do this transformation that is specific to the JMS Binding in the JMS Target invoker. Can we not simply invoke the transformers or the tranformer chain providing the source and target data types from within the invoker? Why is it that we must do it as part of the DataBinding inceptor in the middle of the invocation chain.? Why not do it at the end of the chain which is in the invoker and do this transformation explicitly?
There was an IRC chat and email thread related to this back in September: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm starting to think you may be right and it would be easier to have more of this in the JMS binding itself, especially when looking at implementing support for section 1.5.2 of the current JMS binding draft spec. ...ant
