Simon Laws wrote:
On 5/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
>
>> - tuscany-rmi? Should this be a binding
>>
>>
>> Yes, would be better as tuscany-binding-rmi.
>>
We already have a tuscany-binding-rmi module: the implementation of the
RMI binding.
The tuscany-rmi module defines an RMI hosting extension point, similar
to how the tuscany-http module provides an HTTP host extension point.
To make that clear, I'd suggest to rename tuscany-rmi to
tuscany-host-rmi and tuscany-http to tuscany-host-http.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are right. I didn't spot that. I must be going blind. Agree with the
move to using host in the name.
Simon
Ok, I'll do that rename some time later today then.
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
