Do we want to support pre-2.5 level servlet containers? If so then maybe we
should use the 2.4 version so things don't inadvertently use 2.5 only APIs.

   ...ant

On Nov 13, 2007 1:59 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This sounds like a useful change to get all of our dependencies on
> servlet-api in sync. And, as you say, it does not seem to have any
> negative impact.
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Nov 13, 2007 8:43 AM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When the embedded Tomcat server starts, it produces a series of warnings
> > as shown in the "->" markings below.
> >
> >      [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:56 
> > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEnginestart
> >      [java] INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.10
> >      [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:56
> org.apache.catalina.startup.ContextConfig defaultWebConfig
> >      [java] INFO: No default web.xml
> > ->   [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.catalina.startup.DigesterFactory register
> > ->   [java] WARNING: Could not get url for
> /javax/servlet/jsp/resources/jsp_2_0.xsd
> > ->   [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.catalina.startup.DigesterFactory register
> > ->   [java] WARNING: Could not get url for
> /javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd
> > ->   [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.catalina.startup.DigesterFactory register
> > ->   [java] WARNING: Could not get url for
> /javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd
> > ->   [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.catalina.startup.DigesterFactory register
> > ->   [java] WARNING: Could not get url for
> /javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd
> > ->   [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.catalina.startup.DigesterFactory register
> > ->   [java] WARNING: Could not get url for
> /javax/servlet/resources/j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd
> >      [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocolinit
> >      [java] INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8085
> >      [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57 
> > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocolstart
> >      [java] INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8085
> >      [java] 13-Nov-2007 11:57:57
> org.apache.tuscany.sca.http.tomcat.TomcatServer addServletMapping
> >      [java] INFO: Added Servlet mapping:
> http://localhost:8085/HelloWorldService
> >
> > I have tracked down the cause of these warnings.  The servlet-api jar
> that we
> > are using is not the servlet-api jar that comes with Tomcat.  We are
> using the
> > Sun reference implementation for this jar, and this does not contain all
> the
> > resources expected by Tomcat.  These missing resources cause the
> warnings to
> > be produced.
> >
> > To eliminate the warnings, the following changes are needed:
> > 1) Use a different servlet-api jar that contains all the necessary
> servlet
> >    resources.
> > 2) For the embedded Tomcat environment, also include a jsp-api jar so
> that
> >    the jsp-related resources can be picked up from this jar.
> >
> > For 1), there are many possible jars we could use.  After some
> investigation,
> > it seems that the servlet-api jar that ships with Geronimo is the best
> choice,
> > as it contains all the necessary resources and has an Apache license
> with no
> > dependency on Sun code.  For 2), the jsp-api jar from Geronimo also
> seems to
> > be a good choice for similar reasons.
> >
> > At the moment, many SCA poms contain a mixture of "provided" and "test"
> > references to the 2.4 and 2.5 levels of servlet-api.  I don't see any
> > reason for this mixture (a "compile" dependency would be a different
> matter).
> > The only modules with "compile" dependencies are host-tomcat and
> host-jetty,
> > and these are already using 2.5 (the Sun version).  I went through the
> poms
> > changing all of the servlet-api dependencies to use the Geronimo 2.5version,
> > and I also added a Geronimo jsp-api 2.1 dependency to host-tomcat.  With
> > these changes, everything builds OK and runs in both the embedded and
> > webapp environments, including both Tomcat 5.5.x and 6.0.x, with no
> warning
> > messages.
> >
> > Does anyone have any concerns about my putting these changes into trunk?
> >
> >   Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to