>From another angle, does any spec disallow us from viewing all public setters on a Java impl as properties?
It does say an @Property denotes a property but seems to allow that the converse isn't true. So, while creating a rule that such a property with a setter but no @Property must be listed in .componentType to be considered an impl property doesn't seem completely unreasonable.... I could also see a different interpretation where the property configured via component SCDL gets set on the impl even without the .componentType definition of this property. Agree the spec isn't real clear here. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Raymond Feng (JIRA) < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604572#action_12604572] > > Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2383: > --------------------------------------- > > If the component is implemented in java, I think this is a grey area in the > spec. The spec says the configuration in the componentType should be > compatible with the result from the instrospection of implemention. Let's > say your purpose is to declare a property in the componentType file, then it > has to be associated to a field or setter in the java class. Is the > field/setter required to be protected or public? My understanding is that we > can use the componentType to provide a default value to a property, but not > "add" a new property if it doesn't exist in the impl class. > > There are discussions on the ML about if we should use componentType to > redefine the service interface using interface.wsdl. I think these are in > the same area. > > > Cannot define component property with Component Type File > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: TUSCANY-2383 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383 > > Project: Tuscany > > Issue Type: Bug > > Components: Java SCA Core Runtime > > Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next > > Reporter: Kevin Williams > > > > Lines 450-451 of the Assembly spec: > > The componentType element can contain Service elements, Reference > elements and Property elements. > > I defined a test that inspects an injected property value. In the > initial version I defined the property using the @Property annotation. I > then tried replacing the annotation with an entry in a Component Type File > without success. > > The test: > > > org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.assembly.ctypefile.CompomnentTypeFileTestCase.typeFile3 > demonstrates this failure and is currently @Ignore(d) > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
