I may not fully understand your comment but it seems inconsistent to support the provision of component type information via a type file for service and reference elements but not for property elements.
In the test I have only removed the @Property annotation from the java implementation and replaced it with an element in the Component Type File. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Raymond Feng (JIRA) <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604572#action_12604572 > ] > > Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2383: > --------------------------------------- > > If the component is implemented in java, I think this is a grey area in the > spec. The spec says the configuration in the componentType should be > compatible with the result from the instrospection of implemention. Let's say > your purpose is to declare a property in the componentType file, then it has > to be associated to a field or setter in the java class. Is the field/setter > required to be protected or public? My understanding is that we can use the > componentType to provide a default value to a property, but not "add" a new > property if it doesn't exist in the impl class. > > There are discussions on the ML about if we should use componentType to > redefine the service interface using interface.wsdl. I think these are in the > same area. > >> Cannot define component property with Component Type File >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: TUSCANY-2383 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2383 >> Project: Tuscany >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime >> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next >> Reporter: Kevin Williams >> >> Lines 450-451 of the Assembly spec: >> The componentType element can contain Service elements, Reference elements >> and Property elements. >> I defined a test that inspects an injected property value. In the initial >> version I defined the property using the @Property annotation. I then tried >> replacing the annotation with an entry in a Component Type File without >> success. >> The test: >> org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.assembly.ctypefile.CompomnentTypeFileTestCase.typeFile3 >> demonstrates this failure and is currently @Ignore(d) > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
