[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Becker closed TUSCANY-2109.
-------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Patch applied, immediate issue fixed. Any new findings or requests should 
require a new JIRA.

http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg30266.html 

> Conflicts between component reference interface and promoted composite 
> reference interface are not detected 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TUSCANY-2109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2109
>             Project: Tuscany
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
>    Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.1
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Simon Nash
>            Assignee: Simon Laws
>             Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>
>         Attachments: jira2109.patch, jira2109.zip
>
>
> See TUSCANY-2033 for the background to this problem.
> When a component reference defined with <interface.java> (either explicitly 
> or implicitly by introspection) is promoted to a composite reference defined 
> with <interface.wsdl>, and there is a namespace conflict between the 
> component reference's <interface.java> and the composite reference's 
> <interface.wsdl>. this conflict should be diagnosed as an error because it 
> violates the spec rule that an interface specified on a composite reference 
> must be a compatible superset of the interface of the promoted component 
> reference. In this case, the composite interface is incompatible with the 
> component reference because it has a different namespace.
> There is code in CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectCompositeReferences() to 
> handle connections between composite references and promoted compoennt 
> references. The only interface processing performed in this method is to copy 
> the component reference's interface contract to the composite reference's 
> interface contract if the composite reference does not have an interface 
> contract. Code should be added here to check for conflicts between the 
> composite reference's interface and the component reference's interface if 
> both interfaces are specified.
> Similar code should be added to 
> CompositeWireBuilderImpl.connectCompositeServices() to check that the 
> composite service interface is a compatible subset of the component service 
> interface as required by the spec. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to