On 12/06/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip/> By the way, that reminds me that we need someone to be release manager for this release. Any volunteers? If not, maybe Kelvin, you would be willing to do it, since you've already been doing lots of the prep work.
Yes, in the absence of anyone else taking the opportunity of doing this, I am happy to do it. Regards, Kelvin. Thanks,
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/11/2007 06:02:20 AM: > Good suggestion Steffen. If you were able to open a Jira and dump into it > any thoughts you may have had about the details of how you see this working > that would be great. The more detail you put there, the more likely it is > that someone who wants to get their hands dirty would be likely to pick it > up; unless of course you have plans for doing it yourself. As an aside, > it's always interesting to know the background to why a particular feature > is important to someone, so if you felt like commenting on your scenarios > that would benefit from this too, whether in the JIRA on or the list, that > would be great. > > For my part here are the things that I'd like to see done ... > - reorganisation of the build to create release distributions in line with > the SCA release format > - review and improvement of the samples and implementation of an alternative > simple approach to running the samples that does not involve running a maven > build > - review and improvement of the website documentation > > In addition, some things I'd like to see being done, but I don't see as > absolute prerequisites for a release are ... > - creation of a further sdo sub-project that permits automated exercising of > the sdo plugin and java generator > - more test cases > > In terms of JIRA's, we currently have 3 marked for the specific release > [1], rather then the generic Java-SDO-Next bucket [2] that is the > placeholder for Jiras not assigned to a release. > TUSCANY-1317 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1317>, > TUSCANY-1143 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1143> , > TUSCANY-513 <http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-513> > > The first is there because the originator marked it for the beta1, which it > didn't make, but it looks well defined, so after the beta1 I changed the > fix release to the 1.0 release, but I don't think I'll have the bandwidth to > cover this. > The second is there because I want it to be, and plan to tackle it. > The third is there because the originator has provided a patch and I'm in > the process of committing it. > > In the light of my priorities above, having taken a scan through [2] in > addition to 1143, I plan to look at ... > > TUSCANY-1122 TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2 > TUSCANY-1127 ObtainingDataGraphFromXml, and maybe other samples, > incorrectly accessing xsd:any content > TUSCANY-1284 Manifest version number in Java SDO Impl and Tools jars > TUSCANY-257 recently added file Interface2JavaGenerator.java is not > compatible with JDK 1.4 > > and there are a few others I have my eye on, e.g. 303, if all the above > goes well. > > Regards, Kelvin. > > [1] > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? > reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12311542&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312521&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > [2] > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? > reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312262&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > On 09/06/07, Steffen Glomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i would like to see support for typesafe collections in the xsd2java > > generator. > > > > regards > > Steffen > > > > On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. > > > Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix > > > for > > > 1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on what's > > > important for a next release from my perspective that I'll post > > > soon, but > > > in general I'm just keen to get the good stuff that we have added > > > recently > > > out in a release that, as I said before from my perspective, warrants > > > the > > > title of "1.0". With the Summer holiday season coming up, I'd like to > > > do > > > this soon so that I can sun myself on a beach without that niggling > > > feeling > > > of things that ought to have been done ;-) > > > > > > What say you we put a stake in the ground of aiming for a SDO 1. > 0release to > > > be at the IPMC ratification stage by mid-July? > > > > > > So to that end I ask again, if you have requirements that you feel are > > > fundamental to the next release please raise them now; with the caveat > > > of > > > course that the only way to be sure of getting your requirements into > > > the > > > release is to step forward and supply the fixes. > > > > > > -- > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > On 23/05/07, David Adcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Kelvin, > > > > > > > > I would like to see the multiple namepace issue resolved in the > > > > XSD2JavaGenerator tool. This issue is covered in JIRA 1223. > > > > Optionally, making it available to the plugin (JIRA 303) would be > > > > nice. JIRA 1143 is something that I need fixed, as well. So any > > > > focus that can be given to that prior to this release would be > > > > appreciated. > > > > > > > > In the spirit of cooperation, I'll be posting a first pass on 1223 a > > > > bit later in the week. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun thinking > > > about > > > > a > > > > next release which I believe can be given the version tag > > > 1.0-incubator > > > > . We > > > > have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec in the trunk now, and we > > > currently > > > > have 33 open JIRAs. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? > reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=components&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC > > > > > > > > > > > Please give feedback on those issues which are important to you and, > > > if > > > > possible, step up to provide fixes for those issues. > > > > > > > > If we are to call this the 1.0 release then it ought to provide a > > > really > > > > good experience for the user. Please share your experiences about > > > using > > > > the > > > > beta1 release and make suggestions or contributions to improve the > > > next > > > > one. > > > > Aside from fixes to the code, key contributions would be to improve > > > the > > > > instructions, the samples and the documentation (we already have > > > > discussions going on about the shape of the release distributions on > > > > another > > > > thread). > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
