Please ignore the 2nd part of my previous note -- It was part of an
earlier composition that I meant to delete.

Kelvin.

On 09/10/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Ron,  sorry not to get to this earlier.  I just took a look at this,
> expecting to have to dig quite deep into an area I'm not very familiar
> with,  but debugging through a test case I spotted an anomaly [1]
> which strikes a chord with your description.  I'll commit a fix.  Can
> you let me know if it addresses this issue please?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1838
>
>
> It seems clear the instanceof test  and the cast should be using
> SDOObjectOutputStream.  As it stands the operation will be using the
> helpers belonging to the HelperProviderBase instance, rather than that
> attached to the output stream.  I feel sure this is the issue.  Can
> you check this over and confirm please and I'll make the update.
>
> Regards, Kelvin.
>
>
> On 25/09/2007, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am passing SDO's as parameters between two tiers of my application using 
> > RMI-IIOP. The server code is running within an application server that uses 
> > a complex classloading schema which the Tuscany SDO 
> > DefaultHelperContextImpl.SDOPackageRegistryDelegator class does not handle 
> > well. Specifically, I end up 7 classloaders with different registeries in 
> > different classloaders which totally breaks my application. In pre-SDO 1.0 
> > days, I got around this problem by setting the following EMF system 
> > property 
> > org.eclipse.emf.ecore.EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE='org.eclipse.emf.ecore.impl.EPackageRegistryImpl'.
> >  This no longer appears to work. I would like to use 
> > SDOUtil.createHelperContext() and manage references to the HelperContext 
> > myself. However, the HelperContext created using this technique does not 
> > seem to be available/referenced when CORBA attempts to marshall my 
> > DataGraphs between tiers.
> >
> > 1. Any thoughts for a quick work-around to get me up and running in short 
> > order?
> >
> > 2. Any ideas on a longer-term solution to the problem which doesn't rely on 
> > single shared registry for the entire VM but might work better than the 
> > existing classloader-based scheme?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your assistance.
> >
> > - Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to