Hi ant, thank you for your quick repsonse.
> I'd really like to come up with a better way to make this easier, how about > we add a new Tuscany specific attribute to the JMS binding SCDL to control > this, say format="XML|Object", with the default being format="XML" so the > current functionality remains if you don't define this. So that would look > like: I think having such an option would ease the usage of this Tuscany JMS Binding feature. Thinking of alternatives: I'm really not an expert in Tuscany's databinding capabilities but what do you think about configuring it via databinding? e.g. having of <db:databinding xmlns:db=" http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/databinding/1.0"; name=" org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.javabeans.SimpleJavaDataBinding" /> would mean that JMS messages contain serialized Java-Objects? Regards, Philipp -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Februar 2008 09:34 > An: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org > Betreff: Re: JMS Binding: How to set the xml-format flag? > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Philipp Konradi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > with the new 1.1 release of SCA Java the implementation of JMS Binding > > evolved to support XML-based JMS messages as SCA specs defines. What's > > really great. > > Now JMS binding supports two kinds of JMS messages XML-based and > > Java-Object-serialized ones. > > > > What I was wondering now is how the according xml-format flag can be > > set? Can it be done in the composite's JMS Binding configuration? > > > > Any help is very much appreciated, > > Philipp > > > > > The SCA specs do not define how to do this although it is possible with > the > current Tuscany code, see > http://apache.markmail.org/message/7nvfyxzavua5fypu > > I'd really like to come up with a better way to make this easier, how > about > we add a new Tuscany specific attribute to the JMS binding SCDL to control > this, say format="XML|Object", with the default being format="XML" so the > current functionality remains if you don't define this. So that would look > like: > > <binding.jms format="Object" > > <destination name="RequestQueue" /> > <response> > <destination name="ResponseQueue"/> > </response> > </binding.jms> > > Would this do what you need? Anyone else have comments or alternative > suggestions? > > ...ant >
