This is all incredible feedback. Thanks everyone for responding and commenting on a blog...
Peter, Mike what would be a reasonable first step in trying to work towards a JBI/SCA solution? Realizing that some work i.e. papers have already been written on how such a solution could work. If anybody out there interested in seeing how Tuscany and open ESB could possibly integrate together? I know I would be... On 5/19/08, Peter Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Edwards wrote: > > > <snip> >> >> It is curious in some ways that Sun saw value in building runtimes for >> composite applications and have pursued the JBI specification for >> about the same length of time as the OSOA collaboration of companies >> developed the SCA specifications. > > Actually we started before OSOA. > > ..and yes JBI is for middleware builders. I've never said anything to > the contrary. > >> The hole in that approach is that JBI is really a specification for >> runtime builders (read "vendors"), providing little in the way of a >> model for building applications, which is what customers really care >> about. Sun would do well to recognise this and adopt SCA as the >> application layer which can sit above a JBI runtime. > We may ...and will SCA platform vendors employ JBI? That could enable an > ecosystem of engine/binding offerings based on an open standard as > opposed to the vendor dominated one I heard described at the panel. > > > Peter. > > -- Jeff Anderson http://agileconsulting.blogspot.com/
