Hi Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:41:06 -0500
> Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int only_oob)
>>> {
>>> @@ -73,9 +74,9 @@ static int nand_dump(nand_info_t *nand, ulong off, int
>>> only_oob)
>>> while (i--) {
>>> if (!only_oob) {
>>> printf( "\t%02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x"
>>> - " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x
>>> %02x\n",
>>> - p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5],
>>> p[6], p[7],
>>> - p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13],
>>> p[14], p[15]);
>>> + " %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x %02x\n",
>>> + p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5], p[6], p[7],
>>> + p[8], p[9], p[10], p[11], p[12], p[13], p[14],
>>> p[15]);
>> Still exceeds 80 characters on the last line.
>
> or use lib_generic/display_options.c:print_buffer()
806b4da8: ff ff 01 10 00 00 05 01 ........
or
ff ff 01 10 00 00 05 01
The 806b4da8 is a address RAM address and has nothing to do with the nand
offset.
I think the last printout is better.
Morten
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
