On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:01 AM, Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote:
>> +
>> +void initsdram(void)
>> +{
>> +
>> + volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t
> *)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
>> + int d_init, dbw;
>> + volatile ccsr_gpio_t *pgpio = (void *)
>> (CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GPIO_ADDR);
>> + unsigned int ddr_size;
>> + sys_info_t sysinfo;
>> + phys_size_t dram_size = 0;
>> +
>> + set_next_law(0,LAW_SIZE_1G , LAW_TRGT_IF_DDR_1);
>
> Can we not use fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs()? If not these should be
> using out_be32()
>
> Why can't we use set_next_law / set_law function here???
> I mean at the end they are using out_be32() for setting up LAW
> registers..
>
> - Dipen
I'm confused about what you are saying here.
- k
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
