On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:34 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> +
> >> +#define udelay(x) {int i, j; for (i = 0; i < x; i++) for (j = 0; j <
> >> 10000; j++); }
> > There were many comments on this udelay before, we should not use this
> > define, but use the udelay() which u-boot provides.
> >
>
> Is there a udelay that is defined for the nand_spl build? The problem is
> doing proper time based delay in nand_spl would require a lot more code.
>
No special udelay defined for nand_spl. I only saw the comments on not
to define a extra udelay like that. I understood the reason but that was
one of the reasons for TPL support.
Haiying
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
