On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed Jan 11, 2012 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> > > More so, given the fact that we don't have any control over >> >> > > rbl -- so if rbl changes it's layout for any subsequent board, >> >> > > we'd have to add that as well to the nand driver, and both in >> >> > > u-boot as well as the kernel. >> >> > > >> >> > > I guess the cleanest solution would have been for the rbl to have >> >> > > used the same layout as the one used by u-boot and linux. >> >> > >> >> > Yep, why not do that then? >> >> > >> >> Because rbl is a proprietary bootloader from TI. >> > >> > Don't we actually have replacement bootloader in uboot already ? You >> >> don't need >> >> > xloader with uboot anymore I think. >> >> RBL ist the ROM bootloader in the SoC, it's not only proprietary but also >> in ROM and hence cannot be changed. >> >> RBL executes an AIS script. Sughosh, could you please explain what your AIS >> does or how you create it? > > So basically, this SPL business can be avoided and this all can be done in a > standard way?
I don't know, I never had to deal with booting from NAND. I was just wondering what Sughosh's AIS is doing that he gets these SPL problems. Christian
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
