Lydia Pintscher <lydia.pintsc...@gmail.com> writes: > Perry: Please cool down. Jonathan is handling a few hundred bugs a > day sometimes.
So? > And the Kubuntu team has limited resources which need to be used > wisely. Would you rather have a new package/a fixed bug or him > spending a lot of time on a reply in a bugreport? I think the criterion here seems to be "if we close the bug report, we've succeeded, because that is as good as a fixed bug" rather than "if we've fixed the problem users are experiencing, we've succeeded". This is a twisted criterion. And yes, I'd rather have fewer packages that were properly maintained with care and consideration for the users than some mechanical figure of merit being met. Ubuntu has greatly disappointed me in this regard across the board. It is not enough to claim you want great user experience -- you actually have to deliver, and part of "deliver" means "don't leave a bug report to rot for two years and then close it with an abrupt who cares". The "we're understaffed" excuse doesn't make people feel better about the slap. Perry -- Please package Amarok Rio Karma support (--with-libkarma) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
