On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 17:42 +0000, Ali Onur Uyar wrote: > The bugs 561390 and 527666 seem to be pointing to the very same issue to me. > They are not.
527666 (this bug) describes an issue where mountall simply doesn't wait long enough for block devices to appear that *do* appear. 561390 describes an issue where mountall never receives notification of LVM devices from the kernel. > Infact, I was quite tempted to mark them as duplicates: > Do not. > Why do you think the two bugs refer to separate issues? In what way do > the two bugs differ? How can I identify exactly which issue I am > experiencing? > Since this bug (mountall doesn't wait long enough) has been fixed, if you are experiencing issues you are either experiencing bug 561390 (which has not been marked Fix Released) or a different bug entirely. It's always best to just file a new bug describing your own problems, and allow the developers to triage that bug and determine themselves whether it's a duplicate of a known problem or a new problem not previously known. Scott -- Scott James Remnant [email protected] -- mountall blocks on timeout waiting for a partition, rather than supplying prompt and picking it up later https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527666 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
