stacktrace mentions that the pointer argument passed to ect_check() was
optimised out
Looking at the code, would this mean that gaec == null, hence a null pointer
dereference?
I'm not really a developer
but I know enough C to be dangerous :-)
anyway,
static gboolean
ect_check (gpointer a11y)
{
GalA11yECell *gaec = GAL_A11Y_E_CELL (a11y);
ETableItem *item = gaec->item;
g_return_val_if_fail ((gaec->item != NULL), FALSE);
g_return_val_if_fail ((gaec->cell_view != NULL), FALSE);
g_return_val_if_fail ((gaec->cell_view->ecell != NULL), FALSE);
if (atk_state_set_contains_state (gaec->state_set, ATK_STATE_DEFUNCT))
return FALSE;
if (gaec->row < 0 || gaec->row >= item->rows
|| gaec->view_col <0 || gaec->view_col >= item->cols
|| gaec->model_col <0 || gaec->model_col >= e_table_model_column_count
(item->table_model))
return FALSE;
if (!E_IS_CELL_TEXT (gaec->cell_view->ecell))
return FALSE;
--
evolution SIGSEGV in ect_check()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
