Launchpad has imported 1 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44627.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-10T11:42:20+00:00 Martin Pitt wrote:

>From https://launchpad.net/bugs/900923:

Colin King spent some days doing extensive and accurate power
benchmarking [1], amongst others the effect of the pm-utils power.d
scripts on various machines [2].

It turns out that the readahead and the journal-commit scripts do not
actually save power these days (maybe they did at the time when they got
introduced, but changes in the kernel nullified them?). No measurable
difference on HDD, and on SSD power usage increases by 1.5%. This was
confirmed on an idle system, on a system doing compiling/package build,
and a workload with music playback and browsing, each 5 times over 60
minutes.

Based on this it seems that these scripts should be disabled by default
or removed.

[1] http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/power-benchmarking/
[2] http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/power-benchmarking/pm-utils-results/

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pm-utils/+bug/900923/comments/9


** Changed in: pm-utils
       Status: Unknown => Confirmed

** Changed in: pm-utils
   Importance: Unknown => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900923

Title:
  pm-utils: readahead and journal-commit waste power

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pm-utils/+bug/900923/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to