Hard to imagine how dynamically pinning irqhandlers to certain cpu's would make a difference. But who knows. If the description of instance types is correct the main differences between the two instance types would be that m2 has more memory (7.5GB / 17.1 GB) but has only one 420GB virtual drive, while m1 has two of them. So m2 could run out of cache for network IO less likely/often.
And apart from additional software, is there anything special in the setup that differs from a stock m1.large or m2.xlarge guest? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178707 Title: Kernel Panics - ec2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1178707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
