Launchpad has imported 18 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733819.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-28T22:52:07+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. type /# in the end of any address, e.g. www.cnn.com/# 2. 3. Actual results: scrolling and loading is faster Expected results: Additional info: Maybe you actually did something wrong with regexp? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-28T22:55:48+00:00 fakenxid wrote: see also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670504 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729666 :-) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-29T11:10:44+00:00 fakenxid wrote: " #" blahblah.com # Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-29T13:10:08+00:00 fakenxid wrote: " /\!/" blahblah.com /\!/ Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-29T13:12:03+00:00 fakenxid wrote: This can be automated with keyboard shortcuts: For example Alt D > ctrl right > /\!/ Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-29T15:30:27+00:00 tcallawa wrote: I cannot reproduce this. You're going to need to be a lot more thorough here. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-30T17:08:25+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #5) > I cannot reproduce this. You're going to need to be a lot more thorough here. How about blah.com /\| \ ? :-) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-30T17:12:01+00:00 tcallawa wrote: Yeah, see, that doesn't help. I cannot detect any obvious performance difference by adding additional characters to the URL bar in Chromium. How are you measuring performance? Are you eliminating the possibility of cached content? Can you reproduce this in a measurable way? Does Google Chrome have the same issue? Is this issue specific to a desktop environment? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-30T17:37:13+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #7) > How are you measuring performance? Latency? By type speed, performance with temperature measuring. :p /\| / (this way it's faster, I don't have to learn programming languages and perform benchmarks) I can see speed difference 10x times, idle battery differences 8x...9x times and really low temperature readings. imho someone made several simple mistakes and this adds up. >:] :)) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-30T17:38:26+00:00 fakenxid wrote: Remember then people played games with only 133MHz? >:] Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-07-30T18:54:20+00:00 tcallawa wrote: I'm closing this out, because you're not giving me anything useful to reproduce it, much less accurately determine if an issue exists or not. I have attempted to add various characters to the end of the URL string and it has not resulted in any observable or measurable changes. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05T20:51:06+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #10) > I'm closing this out, because you're not giving me anything useful to > reproduce it, much less accurately determine if an issue exists or not. I > have attempted to add various characters to the end of the URL string and it > has not resulted in any observable or measurable changes. You aren't one these general idiots desktop guys - is it possible to construct window snapping in such a way that it will start obstruct page scrolling of the window itself? :-) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05T20:52:53+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to klfyt from comment #11) > (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #10) > > I'm closing this out, because you're not giving me anything useful to > > reproduce it, much less accurately determine if an issue exists or not. I > > have attempted to add various characters to the end of the URL string and it > > has not resulted in any observable or measurable changes. > > You aren't one these general idiots desktop guys - > is it possible to construct window snapping in > such a way that it will start obstruct page scrolling > of the window itself? > > :-) You can see how they breath fumes of disintegrating batteries and they are still alive. ;-) :)) [it's all conspiracy to sell you ugly ms office! ;-)] Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05T20:53:40+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to klfyt from comment #12) > (In reply to klfyt from comment #11) > > (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #10) > > > I'm closing this out, because you're not giving me anything useful to > > > reproduce it, much less accurately determine if an issue exists or not. I > > > have attempted to add various characters to the end of the URL string and > > > it > > > has not resulted in any observable or measurable changes. > > > > You aren't one these general idiots desktop guys - > > is it possible to construct window snapping in > > such a way that it will start obstruct page scrolling > > of the window itself? > > > > :-) > > You can see how they breath fumes of disintegrating batteries > and they are still alive. ;-) > > :)) [it's all conspiracy to sell you ugly ms office! ;-)] Dunno what's better ugly photoshop or nsa. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05T20:54:47+00:00 fakenxid wrote: At least my scrolling has started to react kinda, in 2019! :)) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-05T21:07:18+00:00 fakenxid wrote: (In reply to klfyt from comment #13) > (In reply to klfyt from comment #12) > > (In reply to klfyt from comment #11) > > > (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #10) > > > > I'm closing this out, because you're not giving me anything useful to > > > > reproduce it, much less accurately determine if an issue exists or not. > > > > I > > > > have attempted to add various characters to the end of the URL string > > > > and it > > > > has not resulted in any observable or measurable changes. > > > > > > You aren't one these general idiots desktop guys - > > > is it possible to construct window snapping in > > > such a way that it will start obstruct page scrolling > > > of the window itself? > > > > > > :-) > > > > You can see how they breath fumes of disintegrating batteries > > and they are still alive. ;-) > > > > :)) [it's all conspiracy to sell you ugly ms office! ;-)] > > Dunno what's better ugly photoshop or nsa. Maybe nsa draws these new icons everywhere. :p Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-12T10:14:14+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1670504 *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2019-08-29T08:13:22+00:00 fakenxid wrote: *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1740095 *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium- browser/+bug/1839716/comments/19 ** Changed in: chromium (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Invalid ** Changed in: chromium (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1729666 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729666 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839716 Title: There is infinite loop in address bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1839716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
