I can confirm that just on the patch-level only two need backporting,
the rest applies as is and I have regenerated them to match the
packaging requirements. The backport-adaptations themselves are minimal.
From the content I guess it is complex enough that nobody can be fully sure.
I'm still reading it ...
Until then a few questions:
- I wonder if we'd also want/need dc293f6 "scsi: fix sense code for EREMOTEIO"
(to ensure this kind of ioerror gets to the guest as well) - what do you think?
- I also wondered about 424740d "scsi-disk: do not complete requests early for
rerror/werror=ignore" but we do not have 40dce4ee applied so that should be ok
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having
miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1967814/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
