Tom H schreef op 09-07-2016 20:45:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 03:39:48 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
It's still more user-friendly to disable secure boot, than to deal
with it, isn't it?
It's certainly simpler. I've disabled SB on my laptop out of sheer
laziness
I only use an old BIOS computers, but assumed one day I should get an
UEFI-secure-boot computer, then I most likely would disable secure
boot. Call it "laziness", I name it "cautiousness to avoid trouble".
In my case, it's just laziness.
I'm not currently using SB on my own laptop because I use upstream
kernels but I'm doing so on four laptops; they single-boot Ubuntu with
its default SB setup without a problem.
My machines also single-boot Ubuntu without a problem.
When "without a problem" becomes a special category worth mentioning,
something is wrong.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
