Hi Rob,

 Thanks for your detailed explanation.

 According to Bryce, we have high enough versions of Xorg stuff in hardy
 for everything to work; the only remaining issue according to Amit is
 that we might need a newer drm kernel module as Intel seems to target
 drm git HEAD instead of kernel.org git HEAD or Ubuntu's kernel HEAD
 (which causes lots of pain).

 So again, this is not an issue for hardy which is what we target for
 the release and should hopefully switch to.  The issue only affects UME
 for the interim period where we work on gutsy + ubuntu-mobile's gutsy
 ppa because Intel folks want to work on GL related stuff -- correct me
 if I'm wrong!

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007, Rhoads, Rob wrote:
> Proposal 1:
> ==========
> For the interim period, while we're on the Ubuntu Mobile PPA code base
> that is based on Gutsy, we could have the deb package containing the PSB
> Gfx driver copy over the libexa with v2.2 when it is installed. This way
> libexa 2.2 would only clobber the previously installed libexa if the PSB
> Gfx driver is installed. When we move to Hardy, the PSB Gfx driver would
> be ported to xorg 1.4 and the need for the libexa hack would go away. 

 Bryce was kind of enough to explain to me that updating libexa for
 gutsy to 2.2 would require updating some 6 or 12 modules as well which
 is an amount of backports we're not prepared to do for an interim
 situation.

 What /might/ be doable is backporting only specific patches identified
 by Intel to the libexa 2.1 tree, just enough to make Poulsbo work and
 as little as possible in general.  If you can point out what small
 changes we could do to libexa 2.1, then we might get this reviewed and
 backported for the interim period.

> Proposal 2:
> ==========
> Another idea is to live without 2D acceleration until we switch to Hardy
> and we move the PSB Gfx driver to xorg 1.4. This is not very desirable
> from Intel's perspective, because we can't get any test coverage or
> performance tuning on the driver until we switch to Hardy.

 This sounds like the sanest approach to me.  Backporting a new libexa
 version seems very intrusive and painful to me.

-- 
Loïc Minier

-- 
Ubuntu-mobile mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile

Reply via email to