On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 01:33:38 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, December 04, 2012 01:19:43 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I was looking for SRUs that had been verified and were aged to the point > > they could be released to updates. I noticed python-django had all three > > bugs verified and was of sufficient age, so I copied it. > > > > Unfortunately, it was only after I copied it that I noticed that all three > > of these bugs were for feature backports that don't meet SRU criteria: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1081388 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1081391 > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1081392 > > > > Then I noticed that they were accepted into precise-proposed by someone > > who is not even a member of ubuntu-sru. > > > > Based on them neither meeting the standard SRU criteria nor being reviewed > > by ubuntu-sru, I removed them from updates a few minutes after copying > > them over (they were never published). > > > > Scott K > > I've gone ahead and removed this from precise-proposed so it doesn't get > inadvertently accepted. > > Scott K
As a further update, I've removed precise/quantal SRUs for walinuxagent tonight due to private bug references in debian/changelog. One of these had been accepted by the same individual. Scott K -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
