On 31 January 2010 04:43, Dustin Kirkland <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Vishal Rao <[email protected]> wrote: > > For a regular user who wants a UI frontend to operate KVM etc, what > > are my options? > > Right now I am quite forced to move to VirtualBox/VMware because I'm > > too noobish to work with the command line. > > Let me reiterate ... I am not proposing that we drop it from the > archive, but merely move it from Main to Universe. > > We use (and depend) on dozens of packages every day that are in > Universe. You would not lose access to virt-manager, but rather the > stated support for the package would actually line up with the reality > I feel we currently have. >From a pure user perspective, please allow me to explain my point of view, as I view it. I'm prettu sure lot's of users see it in a similar way. - Ubuntu/Canonical choose KVM as its main Virtualisation technology. - KVM is gaining more and more attention, especially since Red Hat choose it as its own main virtualisation solution. - Ubuntu wants to be Linux for human beings, which amongst others - and imho - means it needs to maintain a full stack of userland tools for its solutions. I think a GUI application to KVM is a part of that. - Canonical/Ubuntu internal discussions on how "server team" and "desktop team" are separate entities which can't manage to agree on the full stack of end user experience are not what I call "professional support". (Imho virt-manager is part of the server offering, end of discussion. - I understand that having software in Universe is for most users pretty much the same as software in Main, but again, this is a very poor argument in "entreprise environments". At some point bugs will arise which won't get the needed attention because the soft is in Universe. I do apologise in advance if my words seems a bit harsh, as this is obviously not intended. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Serge van Ginderachter Disclaimer: by sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing that: 1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient" 2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it on usenet. 3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company. 4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message "Clear your mind of 'can't.'." - Samuel Johnson
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
