Hi,
> The code in the future branch is much better organized but it
> still relies on the fcntl syscall which may not exist. It also
> tests for the fctnl64 locking commands unnecessarily for some
> configurations.
I can't see, what should happen, when fcntl[64] are not available. Are you
thinking of some fallback function to implement it?
Which configurations do not have the above named lockings? I have looked at
them and the only thing I know might be, that the naming is different, but the
"numbering" can be used for 32/64 bit cases.
Since I (re)wrote that part, I am interested in implementing it better
Thanks, Peter
--
NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone!
Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
