On 1 November 2013 12:16, Vineet Gupta <vineet.gup...@synopsys.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 11/01/2013 04:39 PM, James Hogan wrote:
>> On 01/11/13 10:55, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgu...@synopsys.com>
>>> ---
>>>  extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/defconfig       | 251 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/tb10x_defconfig | 254 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 505 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/defconfig
>>>  create mode 100644 extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/tb10x_defconfig
>>>
>>> diff --git a/extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/defconfig 
>>> b/extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/defconfig
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..449ed64aaf94
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/extra/Configs/defconfigs/arc/defconfig
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
>>> +#
>>> +# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
>>> +# Version: 0.9.34-git
>>> +# Thu Jun  6 14:10:10 2013
>>> +#
>>> +# TARGET_alpha is not set
>>> +TARGET_arc=y
>>
>> Hi Vineet,
>>
>> Other defconfigs appear to be compressed with "make savedefconfig". It
>> probably makes sense for ARC to match.
>>
>> (others tend to be minimal to the point of only specifying the
>> architecture!)
>
> Unlike kernel, I don't see savedefconfig in Makefile.help.
> I was puzzled too as to why other arches have minimal/non-existant defconfig.
> However one of our customers need a specific uclibc config.

We have savedefconfig now, fwiw.
thanks,
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to