Please do not top-post.

On February 24, 2015 2:06:28 AM GMT+01:00, Jean Lee <xiaoyur...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
>I tested the following environment with MIPS32, with CPU BCM7429(MIPS
>r3000),
>(1)
>mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc 4.5.3-2.4 (compiled by Broadcom)
>binutils 2.19(GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.92.20091006)
>uclibc 0.9.32-1
>Segment fault.
>(2)
>mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc 4.5.3-2.4 (compiled by Broadcom)
>binutils 2.19(GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.92.20091006)
>uclibc 0.9.34 git master
>Segment fault.
>(3)
>mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc 4.8 (compiled by Broadcom)
>binutils ?
>uclibc ?
>No .rel.plt segment.
>(4)
>mipsel-linux-uclibc-gcc 4.9 (compiled by me)
>binutils 2.19(GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.92.20091006)
>uclibc 0.9.32-1
>Segment fault.
>(5)
>mips android ndk toolchain
>No .rel.plt segment.

binutils-2.19 is pretty old. Does current 2.25 or master behave the same?
Let's concentrate on gcc 4.9.2 (or trunk), binutils 2.25 (or master) and uClibc 
master.

Thanks,

_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to