-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [rwanda-l] Museveni to open up for Multiparty sysyem
From: "H G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, February 25, 2003 5:29 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Netters,
&nbsp;
Is Museveni's move going to ingriguant some change of heart to his
counterpart in Rwanda? If things stay the way they are, I will say No.
No until, perhaps,&nbsp;after&nbsp;the first mandat as president ( self)
elected.  The reason I say this is because President Kagame follows,
systematically, &nbsp;president Museveni footsteps at the
letter.&nbsp;And this should not come as a surprise since&nbsp;the
&nbsp;only political figure he has been around for so long is Museveni.
As matter of fact, before the split on the management of Congo's
minerals, president Kagame himself( as well as all those who grow up in
Uganda)&nbsp;used to call Museveni his/their cousin.  That is why
Kagame's administrative institutions were set up similar to Uganda's.
Here are some examples:


Both leaders come to power after a military victory. After that, they
set up " a broad based government" whereby people of different political
persuasions would be brought together to rebuild the country"( so as
their say).

Both contries have NEC( National Executive Concil). Every political
decision is communicated/debated in this INVISIBLE/unkown and
self-nominated high level organization.This is the truly but yet
unoficial&nbsp;&nbsp;highest organe of the UMURYANGO-RPF.&nbsp;


President Museveni managed to maintain himself on power thru this system
of " broad based government"or FORUM ,where all the NEC decisions(
nomination, gvt reshaffles, new institutions, etc..), are communicated
to the "so-called" parteners( abasangirangendo) for execution. Wherever
pesident Museveni has succeded, Kagame has to prove that he is capable
of. That is why, president Kagame&nbsp;is taking this coming elections
in his own hands. He wants/needs to prove to his Ugandan counterpart
that he no longer a "boy". That is why will&nbsp; be self-elected
president no MATTER WHAT. NAHO UBUNDI HAZAPFA UMUNTU. After
his&nbsp;first&nbsp;mandat as a ( self)elected president, Kagame will be
forced to shift to multi-party system and his explaination will be (
similar to Museveni's) "The people who have opened their markets to us
are the ones who want us to open political space to multi party
politics," . Now, another question:
As rwandans, are we ready to endure what we are going thru for another
five years: persecution, emprisonment, violation of human rights,
killings... as well as poverty? The obvious answer is No. We need to
find way to have president Kagame be forced to change his agenda before
it is too late. Can we do it? I think&nbsp;the answer is Yes. As the
saying goes: Where there is a Will, there is a&nbsp;Way.  President
Kagame can be elected president, I don't have any &nbsp;problem with
that. My only concern,&nbsp;it&nbsp;got to&nbsp;be&nbsp;done within
democratic standards: set up democratic system that is fair to all ,
fair justice, separation of power( executif, legistlatif and justice),
fair election, ... This is my wish and this is what I fight for: a
democratic system, that is fair to all rwandan children. HG
===
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Museveni Was Firm As Movt Diehards Opposed Opening Up












&nbsp;

Email This Page Print This Page
Visit&nbsp;The&nbsp;Publisher's&nbsp;Site







The Monitor (Kampala)
February 22, 2003 Posted to the web February 24, 2003
Andrew M. MwendaKampala
On January 28, 2003, President Yoweri Museveni declared that Uganda
should open politics to multi party competition. Sunday Monitor talked
to eleven of the twenty two people who attended the historic meeting,
and through their private notes taken during the meeting, we have been
able to build a fair picture of the debate that ensued. On January 28,
2003, President Yoweri Museveni made history when he recommended that
the Movement should turn itself into a political party and open up
political space for other political parties to compete against the
movement. In spite of protestations from movement hardliners in the
meeting against this change, the president was firm and resolute that
the country is ripe for change.




The president made the recommendation during a meeting of the adhoc
committee set up by the movement's National Executive Council (NEC) in
Kyankwanzi on December 18, 2001. The committee was mandated by NEC to
"examine the performance of the movement system in light of the current
political trends/developments, including calls to open up to political
party pluralism with a view to guide the political future of this
country." This was the third time the committee was meeting the
president in a space of only one month. When the discussion was
concluding page 66 of the report where eleven points are listed as the
justification for allowing multi party politics, the president called
for a halt. He said he had a twelfth point to make in favour of
political pluralism - i.e. that the movement needs to purify itself.
Someone asked: "what do you mean by that Mr. President?" And Museveni
began his long explanation. According to inside sources, President
Museveni said that when the National Resistance Movement came to power
in 1986, it decided on a broad based government whereby people of
different political persuasions would be brought together to rebuild the
country. However, Museveni said, over time some people began to say they
do not want to belong to the movement anymore. "I gave people like
[Democratic Party leader Paul] Ssemogere every responsibility yet they
went ahead to undermine the movement even when they were in cabinet and
later resigned," the president reportedly said, "Should we continue with
such people? Let us leave them to go. This is time for "Okwejako" (to
free ourselves). We want them, they do not want us. Let them go." Then
the president made his pitch. He said the fundamental consideration was
not political but economic. He said the country has registered
impressive economic growth over the years through good relations with
development partners and local and foreign investors. He added that the
United States and European Union had both opened their markets to Uganda
(and African) products. "The people who have opened their markets to us
are the ones who want us to open political space to multi party
politics," the president said in his passionate appeal, "We should not
take decisions that will scare away investors because if there is
disinvestment, it will take years and years before we can convince them
to return. So we need to make a tactical compromise in order to realise
our strategic objectives." President Museveni reportedly told the
meeting that Uganda is not like China. "China can afford to say 'no' to
them and get away with it. But we are a small and poor country. Here we
are with both internal political agitation for multi party politics and
external pressure. So let us open up as a matter of strategy since we
cannot face them like China, in order to let our economic transformation
to continue undisturbed." The president said "the movement is still
strong in the country. Let us turn the movement into a political party."
Then two of the committee members - Can. John Bitunguramye from Kisoro
and one Ezra Kikuli fro Bushenyi warned that opening up may reignite the
historical antagonism between Ugand aPeoples' Congress (UPC) and the
Democratic Parties. The two were very specific to their local situation
i.e. the politics in Kisoro and Bushenyi in their contribution. "Let
them organise because we shall also go to the grassroots and counter
organise," was the president's reply. The president went on to give the
example of the ruling party in Tanzania, Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM) or
Revolutionary Party saying that in spite of opening up to multi party
politics, CMM controls nearly 90 percent of the seats in parliament.
Then another committee member, Tarsis Kanwegyere, argued that opening up
the political space will cause intense sectarian political rivalries
leading to chaos. President Museveni shot back saying that will not be
possible because he (the president) is now building a strong and
professional army to ensure against such an eventuality. "What could
perhaps happen is political disintegration of the movement into
different factions as is happening in Zambia today," the president said,
"But that would be a new kind of political struggle we would have to
undertake in order to realise our vision." Kabwegyere then insisted that
opening up to political parties carries the potential to break up the
local council system. The president said that could be partly correct,
but if the movement organised well, it would stop such a development. In
fact, sources at the meeting say that each time someone opposed the
return to political pluralism the president took them on personally with
counter arguments. Eriya Kategaya, Francis Ayume, and Bidandi Ssali
remained silent most of the time as the president did the job for them.
The president then said because the movement is in the majority now, it
needs a "double pronged strategy." "First, the movement should
strengthen itslef through okwejako (i.e. by ridding itself of non loyal
members)," President Museveni said, "And second, we remove restrictions
on those who do not want to be in the movement to organise independently
and freely. This will allow the majority in the movement to consolidate
without appearing to be dictatorial in the eyes of the western powers to
whom we have focused our exports." Betty Aketch said that if multi
parties return, many people in northern Uganda will abandon the movement
and go back to political parties - UPC and DP. Then Bidandi interjected
here saying that statistics from previous LC 111 elections in the north
show that movement candidates won more than 50 percent. Bidandi added
that in places where multi party candidates won, it was because they -
UPC, DP, Reform Agenda etc united against the movement. Apparently, the
president was able to convince the rest that the committee should
recommend to NEC opening up of political space. Then the debate turned
on how this opening up should be realised. Three options were discussed:
to take the matter to the Constitutional Review Commission chaired by
Prof. Sempebwa, or to amend the Political Organisations Act which would
automatically phase out article 269 of the constitution or to do it
through a referendum. Maj. Rolland Kakooza-Mutale said that there should
be no change unless the people at the grassroots are involved. He warned
that the movement would compromise itself if it usurped the powers of
the people by recommending multi party politics without consulting its
supporters. He said if any change is to come, it should be through a
referendum. The referendum attracted the least support, but members
agreed to table these options for adopted by NEC. The president emerged
from the meeting apparently as a hero, and has now won the hearts of
many. President Museveni needs three announcements to remove the rug
from under the feet of his opponents and tower over the country in
political height. First, to support opening up which he has done.
Secondly he needs to announce that he "will not seek nor accept a third
term," and do this before parliament, NEC, the movement conference and
in the state of the nation address. The third will be to institute a
legitimate and transparent process of selecting his successor within the
movement without being seen to be fronting a proxy. In the president
follows this path, his political fortunes will be built in stone and
concrete. First, with his new stand, he has caught the multi party
opposition on the offside. For long, their only agenda has been multi
party politics. What will be their next platform? They will be forced
now to adopt a position on alternative policy proposals, an area where
they are very weak. Secondly, the Reform Agenda was borne of intolerance
within the movement and now this raison detre has been undermined. How
will they reposition themselves? Within the movement and in parliament,
the president has overwhelming support for his new stance. The
hardliners have gone back and are determined to fight the president.
Sources say they are organising the grassroots to oppose any move to
political pluralism. But if the president remains firm, he has
overwhelming support from the senior ranks of the movement, enough to
galvanise the country and win a straight victory in any referendumHelp
STOP SPAM with  the new MSN 8  and get 2 months FREE*






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT









To Post a message, send it to:&nbsp;&nbsp; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



Reply via email to