Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don't you want our evidence on Democrats?


BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 04/08/19 07:30 AM EDT

Ukrainian law enforcement officials believe they have evidence of wrongdoing
by American Democrats and their allies in Kiev, ranging from 2016 election
interference to obstructing criminal probes. But, they say, they’ve been
thwarted in trying to get the Trump Justice Department to act.

Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International
Legal Cooperation Department, told me he and other senior law enforcement
officials tried unsuccessfully since last year to get visas from the U.S.
Embassy in Kiev to deliver their evidence to Washington.

“We were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the
United States,” Kulyk told me in a wide-ranging interview. “However, the
[U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn’t explicitly
deny our visa, but also didn’t give it to us.”

One focus of Ukrainian investigators, Kulyk said, has been money spirited
unlawfully out of Ukraine and moved to the United States by businessmen
friendly to the prior, pro-Russia regime of Viktor Yanukovych.

Ukrainian businessmen “authorized payments for lobbying efforts directed at
the U.S. government,” he told me. “In addition, these payments were made
from funds that were acquired during the money-laundering operation. We have
information that a U.S. company was involved in these payments.” That
company is tied to one or more prominent Democrats, Ukrainian officials
insist.

In another instance, he said, Ukrainian authorities gathered evidence that
money paid to an American Democrat allegedly was hidden by Ukraine’s
<https://nabu.gov.ua/en> National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) during the
2016 election under pressure from U.S. officials. “In the course of this
investigation, we found that there was a situation during which influence
was exerted on the NABU, so that the name of [the American] would not be
mentioned,” he said.

Ukraine is infamous for corruption and disinformation operations; its police
agencies fight over what is considered evidence of wrongdoing. Kulyk and his
bosses even have political fights over who should and shouldn’t be
prosecuted. Consequently, allegations emanating from Kiev usually are taken
with a grain a salt.

But many of the allegations shared with me by more than a half-dozen senior
Ukrainian officials are supported by evidence that emerged in recent U.S.
court filings and intelligence reports. The Ukrainians told me their
evidence includes:

*        Sworn statements from two Ukrainian officials admitting that their
agency tried to
<https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435029-as-russia-collusion-fades-ukrai
nian-plot-to-help-clinton-emerges> influence the 2016 U.S. presidential
election in favor of  <https://thehill.com/people/hillary-clinton> Hillary
Clinton. The effort included leaking an alleged ledger showing payments to
then-Trump campaign chairman  <https://thehill.com/people/paul-manafort>
Paul Manafort;



*        Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian
officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump;



*        Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company
<https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-ni
ghtmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived> routed more than $3 million to American
accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then-Vice President
<https://cms.thehill.com/people/joe-biden> Joe Biden, who managed
U.S.-Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden’s son served on
the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings;



*        Records that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in
March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma
Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about the financial
transfers;



*        Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S.
Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on
Ukrainian soil;



*        Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that
prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the
country, including to the United States.

Ukrainian officials say they don’t want to hand the evidence to FBI agents
working in Ukraine because they believe the bureau has a close relationship
with the NABU and the U.S. Embassy. “It is no secret in Ukrainian political
circles that the NABU was created with American help and tried to exert
influence during the U.S. presidential election,” Kulyk told me.

Kulyk’s boss, Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, told me he has enough
evidence — particularly involving Biden, his family and money spirited out
of Ukraine — to warrant a meeting with U.S. Attorney General
<https://thehill.com/people/william-barr> William Barr. “I’m looking forward
to meeting with the attorney general of the United States in order to start
and facilitate our joint investigation regarding the appropriation of
another $7 billion in U.S. dollars with Ukrainian legal origin,” Lutsenko
said.

I
<https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-ni
ghtmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived> wrote last week that Biden, in 2016,
pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s top
prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma.

Kulyk confirmed Ukraine is investigating that alleged incident: “We have
evidence and witnesses stating that Joe Biden applied pressure on Ukrainian
law enforcement to stop the investigation.”

Ukrainians officials have gone public in recent days with their frustrations
after months of trying to deliver the evidence quietly to the Trump
Department of Justice (DOJ) fizzled. Unable to secure visas from the U.S.
Embassy, some Ukrainian law enforcement officials sought backdoor channels,
Kulyk said.

One of those avenues involved reaching out last fall to a former federal
prosecutor from the George W. Bush years, according to interviews. He
delivered a written summary of some of the Ukrainian allegations to the U.S.
attorney’s office in Manhattan, along with an offer to connect U.S.
investigators with individuals purporting to have the evidence. There was no
response or follow-up, according to multiple people directly familiar with
the effort.

More recently,  <https://cms.thehill.com/people/donald-trump> President
Trump’s private attorney Rudy Giuliani — former mayor and former U.S.
attorney in New York City — learned about some of the allegations while, on
behalf of the Trump legal team, he looked into Ukrainian involvement in the
2016 election.

Since then, Lutsenko and others have talked with other American lawyers
about helping to file U.S. legal action to recover money they believe was
wrongly taken from their country.

“It’s like no one at DOJ is listening. There is some compelling evidence
that should at least be looked at, evaluated, but the door seems shut at
both State and Justice,” said an American who has been contacted for help
and briefed on the evidence.

State Department officials declined to address whether they denied or
slow-walked visas for Ukrainian officials. “Visa records are confidential
under U.S. law; therefore, we cannot discuss the details of individual visa
cases,” a department spokesperson said.

Ukraine’s evidence, if true, would mark the first documented allegation of
Democrats receiving assistance from a foreign power in their efforts to help
Clinton win the 2016 election.

“It looks like there is some evidence emerging that there could have been a
proxy war between Russia and Ukraine to secure their preferred American
president during the 2016 race,” said a former top intelligence official who
now advises the Trump administration on intelligence policy.

There is public-source information, in Ukraine and in the United States,
that gives credence to some of what Ukrainian prosecutors allege.

A court in Ukraine formally concluded that law enforcement officials there
illegally tried to intervene in the 2016 U.S. election by leaking documents
of Manafort’s business dealings after he was named Trump’s campaign
chairman. And a Ukrainian parliamentarian released a purported tape
recording of a top Ukrainian law enforcement official bragging that he was
responsible for the leak and was trying to help Clinton win.

Lutsenko
<https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/434875-top-ukrainian-justice-official-say
s-us-ambassador-gave-him-a-do-not-prosecute> told Hill.TV in an interview
aired last week that he has opened a criminal investigation into those
allegations.

Nellie Ohr, wife of a senior Justice official and a researcher for the
Fusion GPS opposition research firm, testified to Congress last year that
some of Fusion GPS’s research on Trump-Russia ties
<https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/06/nellie-ohr-fusion-gps-leshchenko-ukraine
/> came from a Ukrainian parliamentarian. The Democratic Party and the
Clinton campaign paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump.

Although Ohr acknowledged the Ukrainian source, lawmakers did not press her
to be more specific.

And Politico
<https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-2334
46> reported in 2017 on evidence of Ukraine’s U.S. embassy helping the
Clinton campaign to discredit Trump. “A Ukrainian-American operative who was
consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in
the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between
Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia,” the newspaper reported.

Separately, the conservative nonprofit Citizens United last month filed a
lawsuit seeking to force the State Department to disclose all information it
possesses about Hunter Biden and his business partners involved with
Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings.

If Ukrainian prosecutors can augment their allegations with real evidence,
there could be a true case of collusion worth investigating.

The only question is why the U.S. government so far hasn’t taken interest —
and whether Attorney General Barr will change that.

John Solomon is an award-winning investigative journalist whose work over
the years has exposed U.S. and FBI intelligence failures before the Sept. 11
attacks, federal scientists’ misuse of foster children and veterans in drug
experiments, and numerous cases of political corruption. He serves as an
investigative columnist and executive vice president for video at The Hill.

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/ugandanet@kym.net/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to