Obama had it right — a circular firing squad is on the way

BY MARK PENN, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR

04/09/19 09:15 AM EDT
<https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/437969-obama-had-it-right-a-circular-f
iring-squad-is-on-the-way#bottom-story-socials>  843

THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE
HILL

President  <https://thehill.com/people/barack-obama> Barack Obama was right
to warn the Democratic Party that, unless it reshapes its course, it
<https://thehill.com/homenews/news/437692-obama-im-worried-progressives-may-
form-a-circular-firing-squad> may create a circular firing squad.
Historically, just look to the Democratic Party of 1972, when George
McGovern lost 49 states to Richard Nixon, another controversial, polarizing
president. It was both the high point of the progressive movement in the
party and the low point of the party’s presidential power.

Except for a brief recovery post-Watergate with Jimmy Carter, Democrats did
not come back from their 1972 record loss until 1992, and that was with a 41
percent vote for President  <https://thehill.com/people/bill-clinton> Bill
Clinton, aided by the entry of independent Ross Perot into that year’s
presidential race. Even with that help, it took a return to the center to
reignite the fortunes of the Democratic Party and we got 49 per cent in
1996.

Last November, Democrats made significant gains in the House of
Representatives,
<http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/11/with-one-last-democratic-victory-in-
california-midterms-end.html> adding a total of 40 districts and taking the
majority. Most of those were suburban districts that voted for Republicans
<https://thehill.com/people/willard-mitt-romney> Mitt Romney or
<https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump> Donald Trump in the past. They are
not districts that could ever be won by an
<https://thehill.com/people/alexandria-ocasio-cortez> Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), a  <https://thehill.com/people/bernie-sanders>
Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), or any of the leaders of the new progressive wing of
the Democratic Party. These districts’ voters were concerned about health
care, saw the Trump administration as out of step with their more centrist
concerns, and gave low marks to a Republican House led by then-Speaker
<https://thehill.com/people/paul-ryan> Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) that seemed
fractured and ineffective.

Since the midterms, Trump continues to enjoy strong ratings on the economy
and for combatting terrorism, two issues of heightened importance in
family-oriented suburbs. In addition, he has been cleared by special counsel
<https://thehill.com/people/robert-mueller> Robert Mueller of the charge of
colluding with the Russians. Women still have grave doubts about him, but he
has proven a tough competitor, defying the odds.

But what have swing voters been hearing from Democrats, since switching
their votes in the midterms over to the Dems? Socialism, anti-Semitism,
resistance, more investigations. Not exactly a platform for re-election.

And the congressional Socialists led by Rep. Ocasio-Cortez are even
threatening mainstream Democrats with primaries. Yup, replacing moderates in
swing districts with left-wing democratic socialists is surely the way to
expand the majority. Suburbanites are clamoring for them. Higher taxes is
just what hard-pressed suburban voters with lots of responsibilities are
seeking.

The public face of the party today is far removed from what created a solid
group of freshmen in suburban districts. And they have been bombarded with a
lot more than just slogans. Ocasio-Cortez, who pulled down about 15,000
votes in a Democratic primary in a safe district, is world-renowned now for
the Green New Deal — just a little program to nationalize the energy
industry while promising guaranteed incomes for all; its price tag has been
put at $93 trillion. It’s Ocasio-Cortez who drove Amazon out of New York,
not understanding that the tax breaks for the company would have come from
10 times the tax revenue that the new jobs would have created, or that their
absence blows a $27 billion hole in future budgets. Comically, she thought
you could spend the $3 billion on other things.

The other new face of the party has been Rep.
<https://thehill.com/people/ilhan-omar> Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who spread her
anti-Israel positions by expressing anti-Semitic tropes about how Jews in
America have divided loyalties and how Jews have bought support for Israel
with “Benjamins.” Despite most voters believing Omar should be off the House
Foreign Affairs Committee with these views, House Speaker
<https://thehill.com/people/nancy-pelosi> Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has kept
her on this prestigious assignment while passing over moderates.

Let’s not forget the daily voices of Reps.
<https://thehill.com/people/jerrold-nadler> Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and
<https://thehill.com/people/adam-schiff> Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). They get
media coverage (to a shrinking audience) on how there really is evidence of
collusion and make escalating demands for the tax returns of Donald Trump
and his associates. Nixon had an enemies list of people he was going to
audit — and these folks are attempting to revive the practice. It didn’t
work out that well for Nixon.

The Democratic House and Senate leaders apparently decided that resistance
to the Trump administration — rather than true deal-making — makes the most
sense, holding out for a presidential victory in 2020. That strategic
decision, unless soon reversed, might be their undoing. Had they opted for
deals, they would have made a DACA-for-border-security swap, moved on
infrastructure, and partnered on tax cuts to provide much more deductibility
of state and local taxes. They think no deal is a better deal. Americans may
— or may not — think so.

While Democrats like Ocasio-Cortez, Omar and Rep.
<https://thehill.com/people/maxine-waters> Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) have
been given outsized power, the newly elected moderates — the ones whose
victories empowered the other Democrats in the House — have been largely
shunted to the side. They have been castigated from all sides, protested
against in their town hall meetings, denied plum committee assignments, and
had to accept a watered-down resolution condemning anti-Semitism.

On top of all of these discordant voices in Congress are the 15 or so
Democratic presidential candidates, many of them vying for the ultra-left
sliver of Democratic activists and media who are far removed from the life
of the everyday Democratic voter. Many are backing the Green New Deal,
immigration policies that approach open borders, and are united in their
desire to raise taxes for new spending.

 <https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden> Joe Biden, a potentially moderating
influence on all this, has been temporarily set back with charges that his
glad-handing was too intimate, and he has been tied up in knots explaining
his behavior even before getting to the starting gate. Another potential
moderate on economic issues, former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, has
decided he would not have a chance in this New Democratic Party. That leaves
Starbucks founder Howard Schultz in the center and, since he is running
outside of the party, he is more likely to be a spoiler than to convince
more Democratic candidates to move to the center with him.

If there’s not a change of course here in the next year, Barack Obama is
right that 2020 is shaping up to be more like a circular firing squad than a
march to victory. If someone in the leadership of the House or among the
presidential candidates does not stand up and reset the emerging
positioning, the party will be painted as running on a platform of
socialism, $93 trillion for global warming, anti-Israel policies, open
borders, a government takeover of the health care system, and raising taxes
to boot.

The course to Democratic victory in 2020 is responsible free enterprise, not
socialism; the center, not the left; and policies based on reality, not tens
of trillions of dollars. This was true in the past — and I believe it holds
true for the future. 

Mark Penn is a managing partner of the Stagwell Group, a private equity firm
specializing in marketing services companies, as well as chairman of the
Harris Poll and author of “Microtrends Squared.” He also is CEO of MDC
Partners, an advertising and marketing firm. He served as pollster and
adviser to President Clinton from 1995 to 2000, including during Clinton’s
impeachment. You can follow him on Twitter @Mark_Penn. 

Trump for 2020 }

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko" 

 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/ugandanet@kym.net/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to