Ar 11:51 -0800 2000-09-02, scríobh John Cowan: >Its only real competitor is the SIL set, and an effort is underway to >incorporate it en masse (or nearly so) into the RFC 1766 registry. I assure you that this will not happen. We have procedures and they must be followed, and dumping thousands of languages into the IANA registry without looking at the actual requirements would be a grave mistake. Michael Everson RF 1766 Language Tag Reviewer
- Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Doug Ewell
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) John Cowan
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Peter_Constable
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Doug Ewell
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) John Cowan
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Peter_Constable
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Michael Everson
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Peter_Constable
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Michael Everson
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Peter_Constable
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Michael Everson
- Re: Plane 14 redux (was: Same language, two locales) Peter_Constable