Jukka Korpela wrote: > Does Unicode encode traditional and simplified Chinese characters > separately, or is the difference considered as glyph variation only, > to be indicated (if desired) at higher protocol levels? They are encoded separately, at different code points. What you heard about language-dependent differences in Han glyphs is probably this: language tagging, in theory, could be used to trigger some (very minor) stylistic variations between Chinese and Japanese typographical traditions. > My mental model is the following: > [...] > - you could thus recode Big5 and GB to Unicode, and you could leave > the glyph issue unspecified (so that the recipient user could > select either traditional or simplified glyphs). That's also my understanding, although you expressed it more elegantly. _ Marco
- Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Steven R. Loomis
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Doug Ewell
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Ayers, Mike
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Peter_Constable
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Jukka . Korpela
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Michael Everson
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional John Cowan
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Michael Everson
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan