Re: ConScript registry?

[DougEwell2]

In a message dated 2001-01-31 5:46:59 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> >Don't forget Deseret, which will, in fact, be part of Unicode 3.1.
>  
>  Version 2.1 of ConScript removes Deseret and points the user to the SMP.
>  (John Cowan hasn't updated the mirror site yet.) This is an object lesson
>  in the volatility of the Private Use Area. I suppose I ought to do up a
>  mapping table for anyone who used the old Deseret.

I already made such a table and can send it to anyone who is interested.

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California