On 2001.02.23 15:06, Curtis Clark wrote: > At 07:04 PM 2/22/01, Joel Rees wrote: > >I'm telling you that 17 planes is not enough, and it _will_ become a painful > >constraint in your lifetime. > > So Plane 9, say, can be nothing but surrogates-of-surrogates, to some 64- > or 128-bit code space. > You do mean for UTF-16, don't you? Joel Rees, Media Fusion Amagasaki, Japan
- fictional scripts revisited Thomas Chan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited David Starner
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Thomas Chan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- Re: fictional scripts revisited John H. Jenkins
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Ayers, Mike
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Daniel Biddle
- Re: fictional scripts revisited David Starner
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable